The 2010 correction is itself problematic. The original data in Science 306:271 is problematic itself, and the description of the data is slightly different between PNAS 103:1717 and Science 306:271.
http://www.pnas.org/content/107/16/7616.extract"BIOCHEMISTRY Correction for “Activation of the E3 ubiquitin ligase Itch through a phosphorylation-induced conformational change,” by Ewen Gallagher, Min Gao, Yun-Cai Liu, and Michael Karin, which appeared in issue 6, February 7, 2006, of Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (103:1717–1722; first published January 30, 2006; 10.1073/pnas.0510664103).
The authors note that a portion of Fig. 1 was reprinted from Gao M, Labuda T, Xia Y, Gallagher E, Fang D, Liu YC, Karin M (2004) Jun turnover is controlled through JNK-dependent phosphorylation of the E3 ligase itch. Science 306:271–275. Although the reference was included in the original text of the manuscript as ref. 7, the authors neglected to state in the figure legend that the blot used in Fig. 1F is the same blot (probed with a different antibody) shown in Fig. 3E of Gao et al. 2004. The figure and its corrected legend appear below."